<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Flip Ultra and iPod nano video quality compared</title> <atom:link href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/flip-ultra-and-ipod-nano-video-quality-compared/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/flip-ultra-and-ipod-nano-video-quality-compared/</link> <description>Dropping Gadgets, Breaking News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>By: New iPod Nano and Flip Ultra compared side-by-side &#124; AppleFever.NET &#124; The Hot Apple Blog</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/flip-ultra-and-ipod-nano-video-quality-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-254857</link> <dc:creator>New iPod Nano and Flip Ultra compared side-by-side &#124; AppleFever.NET &#124; The Hot Apple Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:25:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/?p=29489#comment-254857</guid> <description>[...] Over the weekend, NewTeeVee featured their comparison review of the Flip Ultra and the new iPod Nano. Obviously, the image recorded on the Flip is clearer than the iPod Nano.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over the weekend, NewTeeVee featured their comparison review of the Flip Ultra and the new iPod Nano. Obviously, the image recorded on the Flip is clearer than the iPod Nano.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: New iPod Nano and Flip Ultra compared side-by-side &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/flip-ultra-and-ipod-nano-video-quality-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-254853</link> <dc:creator>New iPod Nano and Flip Ultra compared side-by-side &#124; TechFever Network &#124; The Hot Tech News and Gadget Network</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:16:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/?p=29489#comment-254853</guid> <description>[...] Over the weekend, NewTeeVee featured their comparison review of the Flip Ultra and the new iPod Nano. Obviously, the image recorded on the Flip is clearer than the iPod Nano.  [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over the weekend, NewTeeVee featured their comparison review of the Flip Ultra and the new iPod Nano. Obviously, the image recorded on the Flip is clearer than the iPod Nano.  [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: 5th-Gen iPod Nano Review And Flip Comparison &#124; MP4 Nation Blog</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2009/09/flip-ultra-and-ipod-nano-video-quality-compared/comment-page-1/#comment-254831</link> <dc:creator>5th-Gen iPod Nano Review And Flip Comparison &#124; MP4 Nation Blog</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 07:49:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/?p=29489#comment-254831</guid> <description>[...] Over at Slippery Brick they&#8217;ve pitched the new Nano camera up against the Flip Ultra. The Flip won. See the video here. [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Over at Slippery Brick they&#8217;ve pitched the new Nano camera up against the Flip Ultra. The Flip won. See the video here. [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/10 queries in 0.014 seconds using disk

Served from: www.slipperybrick.com @ 2012-02-14 06:20:04 -->
