<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Another hit for Toshiba and HD DVD</title> <atom:link href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/</link> <description>Dropping Gadgets, Breaking News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>By: Joel</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67694</link> <dc:creator>Joel</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 22:38:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67694</guid> <description>Bluray FTW..i LOL at those still clinging to the thread that is hd-dvd.open your EYES!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bluray FTW..</p><p>i LOL at those still clinging to the thread that is hd-dvd.</p><p>open your EYES!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: The Future is BLU</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67619</link> <dc:creator>The Future is BLU</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 13:48:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67619</guid> <description>HdDvdNet, you&#039;re pathetic. Give up already.Even though Universal and Paramount have both come out and said their “current plan is to continue to support HD-DVD”, not only is the word &quot;current&quot; conspicuously present in the statement, the word &quot;exclusively&quot; is conspicuously absent. They can&#039;t anything else for contractual reasons, but you bet that once they have the legal kinks sorted out they will support both formats and doing so will put the final nail on HD-DUD&#039;s coffin.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HdDvdNet, you&#8217;re pathetic. Give up already.</p><p>Even though Universal and Paramount have both come out and said their “current plan is to continue to support HD-DVD”, not only is the word &#8220;current&#8221; conspicuously present in the statement, the word &#8220;exclusively&#8221; is conspicuously absent. They can&#8217;t anything else for contractual reasons, but you bet that once they have the legal kinks sorted out they will support both formats and doing so will put the final nail on HD-DUD&#8217;s coffin.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Graham</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67044</link> <dc:creator>Graham</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 16:20:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67044</guid> <description>Hi I want to be forced into buying a PS3 to play the inferior format and inferior games.  Go Blu!  Go PS3!  We&#039;re Number 3!!!</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi I want to be forced into buying a PS3 to play the inferior format and inferior games.  Go Blu!  Go PS3!  We&#8217;re Number 3!!!</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Dbrown</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67028</link> <dc:creator>Dbrown</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67028</guid> <description>I just want this format war to be over.  I sat it out until this past November (Until I saw Spiderman 3 on Blu Ray and 60&quot; LCD).I had no favorites, no vested interest in either format, so I did what I did when I bought my first computer.  Do I want Mac or PC?  Hmmmm. Look at the titles available.  That&#039;s what decided me on my first computer.  Macintosh computers are still around, in fact I&#039;m using one now.  Maybe HD DVD will survive.  Almost ALL of the movies I tend to see lately are Disney, Fox, Sony and Warners.  Deciding on Blu Ray was a no brainer for me.For myself, I&#039;m not believing anything as fact until I see the press release from Paramount and Universal.  It would be awesome if they would also support Blu Ray, but like I said, they haven&#039;t been producing too movies that I&#039;m dying to see on high def and the standard def movies look fabulous in my Blu Ray player.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just want this format war to be over.  I sat it out until this past November (Until I saw Spiderman 3 on Blu Ray and 60&#8243; LCD).</p><p>I had no favorites, no vested interest in either format, so I did what I did when I bought my first computer.  Do I want Mac or PC?  Hmmmm. Look at the titles available.  That&#8217;s what decided me on my first computer.  Macintosh computers are still around, in fact I&#8217;m using one now.  Maybe HD DVD will survive.  Almost ALL of the movies I tend to see lately are Disney, Fox, Sony and Warners.  Deciding on Blu Ray was a no brainer for me.</p><p>For myself, I&#8217;m not believing anything as fact until I see the press release from Paramount and Universal.  It would be awesome if they would also support Blu Ray, but like I said, they haven&#8217;t been producing too movies that I&#8217;m dying to see on high def and the standard def movies look fabulous in my Blu Ray player.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Lee</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67015</link> <dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:46:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67015</guid> <description>Paramount and Universal have both said their current plans are to support HD-DVD. Neither of them sad they will ONLY support HD-DVD and neither of them said they will still be supporting HD-DVD at any point in the future.HD-DVD has lost and the best thing everyone can do is leave HD-DVD the hell alone and end this mess as soon as possible.Anyone who signs that stupid petition above me is basically saying they want the format war to continue and even if Warner went back to HD-DVD BluRay would still have more manufacturer support, more studio support, more worldwide stand alone player sales and 350k+ PlayStation 3 BluRay players being sold every week.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Paramount and Universal have both said their current plans are to support HD-DVD. Neither of them sad they will ONLY support HD-DVD and neither of them said they will still be supporting HD-DVD at any point in the future.</p><p>HD-DVD has lost and the best thing everyone can do is leave HD-DVD the hell alone and end this mess as soon as possible.</p><p>Anyone who signs that stupid petition above me is basically saying they want the format war to continue and even if Warner went back to HD-DVD BluRay would still have more manufacturer support, more studio support, more worldwide stand alone player sales and 350k+ PlayStation 3 BluRay players being sold every week.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kyle</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67009</link> <dc:creator>Kyle</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:31:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67009</guid> <description>No, this is true.  Please read more carefully.  Universal and Paramount have not announced any shift in allegiance, but Warner&#039;s decision activated &#039;escape&#039; clauses in the contracts, thus ending their promise (i.e. their contractual obligation) to remain exclusively HD DVD, just as the article says.Sign all the petitions you want.  Petitions won&#039;t change things, but buying a few million more HD DVDs might have.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, this is true.  Please read more carefully.  Universal and Paramount have not announced any shift in allegiance, but Warner&#8217;s decision activated &#8216;escape&#8217; clauses in the contracts, thus ending their promise (i.e. their contractual obligation) to remain exclusively HD DVD, just as the article says.</p><p>Sign all the petitions you want.  Petitions won&#8217;t change things, but buying a few million more HD DVDs might have.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: HdDvdNet</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/comment-page-1/#comment-67003</link> <dc:creator>HdDvdNet</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 14:03:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2008/01/blu-ray-beating-hd-dvd/#comment-67003</guid> <description>These rumors have already been debunked as false. Universal and Paramount both have released press announcements yesterday that they will continue to support HD DVD!To sign a petition against the Warner descision to drop support for HD DVD go here: http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These rumors have already been debunked as false. Universal and Paramount both have released press announcements yesterday that they will continue to support HD DVD!</p><p>To sign a petition against the Warner descision to drop support for HD DVD go here: <a
href="http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.petitiononline.com/SAVEHDD/petition.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 1/14 queries in 0.012 seconds using disk

Served from: www.slipperybrick.com @ 2012-02-14 08:32:46 -->
