Search
Meizu M7 touch screen miniPlayer |
Illustrated right is a render of the Meizu M7 touch screen miniPlayer geared to compete directly with iPod Touch. The media player is targeted for a March 2008 release with a price tag that could draw business away from Apple for all but the most die-hard iPod users. The tentatively named M7 will sport a 2.8 inch touch screen with a 16:9 480×228 resolution and supports H.264 playback. At $100, $110 and $150 for 2GB, 4GB and 8GB models respectively, the M7 is likely to be a very popular iPod clone.
While a cheaper alternative to the Apple iPod MP3 player, its lower price likely indicates this Chinese manufactured Miezu clone will lack the quality and attention to detail that the Apple players have become known for. The design concept has only recently and hurriedly been announced so stay tuned for any updates.
Miezu M7 miniPlayer via Anythingbutipod
  |
RELATED ARTICLES:
iPod nano 4G leaked, no logo
Star Wars: Clone Wars iSpeaker
Nintendo Wii clone in China is named Vii
Star Wars Clone Wars MP3 players
“its lower price likely indicates this Chinese manufactured Miezu clone will lack the quality and attention to detail that the Apple players have become known for”
If you buy a Honda does that mean it lacks the quality and attention to detail of a Mercedes? NO! Actually Honda has a better track record for quality.
I’m not going to say that Meizu builds a better product than Apple, but to suggest that something is of lower quality due to its cost is retarded. I own a Meizu M6, comparable to the iPod Nano. The quality and attention to detail is superb and… ready? It was a hell of a lot cheaper and has more bells and whistles!
Perhaps Apple overprices their products for more profit. I bet they could lower the prices of their products considerably and still make a huge profit if they wanted to. But why would those greedy bastards want to do that?
yeah, I agree… hmmm lets look at apples past with rigs… same thing you could build yourself(for a lot cheaper) and the mac os… wow… that’s uhhhhh well dumb if you ask me… why pay more for something that’s not as versatile