<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Google spending big bucks on mobile plans</title> <atom:link href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/</link> <description>Dropping Gadgets, Breaking News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>By: verizone</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-69132</link> <dc:creator>verizone</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 19 Jan 2008 03:29:57 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/#comment-69132</guid> <description>i hate when the coolest of phones dont go with my network. like the iphone and now the google phone dont go with verisone its so stupid</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i hate when the coolest of phones dont go with my network. like the iphone and now the google phone dont go with verisone its so stupid</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: antihostile</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-28120</link> <dc:creator>antihostile</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 05 Aug 2007 19:05:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/#comment-28120</guid> <description>Unfortunately, Google&#039;s &quot;principles&quot; only go so far, as we&#039;ve seen in their decision to help China censor internet results.But as far as the phone goes, isn&#039;t Google&#039;s plan to build a nation-wide wifi network, and isn&#039;t it possible that the bandwidth would be enough to then support the phone? That I&#039;d like to see.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Google&#8217;s &#8220;principles&#8221; only go so far, as we&#8217;ve seen in their decision to help China censor internet results.</p><p>But as far as the phone goes, isn&#8217;t Google&#8217;s plan to build a nation-wide wifi network, and isn&#8217;t it possible that the bandwidth would be enough to then support the phone? That I&#8217;d like to see.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: OLDIESRULE</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-27946</link> <dc:creator>OLDIESRULE</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 14:40:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/#comment-27946</guid> <description>not so fast, Mr. Spacey. If there&#039;s onhe thing I&#039;ve learned by observing Mssrs. Brin &amp; Page it&#039;s their ability to hew to their values no matter what. My guess is they will end up co-opting the Telcos &amp; Cablecos, rather than the other way around.Greed makes one stupid and inconsistent; principle has exactly the opposite effect.Astute observation though.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not so fast, Mr. Spacey. If there&#8217;s onhe thing I&#8217;ve learned by observing Mssrs. Brin &amp; Page it&#8217;s their ability to hew to their values no matter what. My guess is they will end up co-opting the Telcos &amp; Cablecos, rather than the other way around.</p><p>Greed makes one stupid and inconsistent; principle has exactly the opposite effect.</p><p>Astute observation though.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: modern_talkin</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-27898</link> <dc:creator>modern_talkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Aug 2007 06:51:08 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/#comment-27898</guid> <description>kayser9, you couldn&#039;t have said it better.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kayser9, you couldn&#8217;t have said it better.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: kayser9soze</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/comment-page-1/#comment-27823</link> <dc:creator>kayser9soze</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 03 Aug 2007 20:29:41 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/08/google-mobile-phone-spending/#comment-27823</guid> <description>Why in the world would they partner with a monopolizing company if they are trying to evolve the wireless information market. At&amp;t, verizon, nextel, t-mobile will pigeon hole their new/current subscribers into another round of contract signings. Has no one learned from the innovative thinking of Virgin mobile? Slowly but surely I am seeing parents gradually send their money in the direction of Mr. Branson&#039;s company. The idea that we are still limited in connectivity and despite the fact that we own the intellectual property (as in the actual phone you purchased) and still cannot do as we choose with devices shows the lack of market freedom in the u.s wireless market. Expansion for the consumer is the next turn that these up and coming companies should look into. Google has been a brand founded and loved for it&#039;s freedom and anti stance of structured empires. Cross platform has been the mantra of this little engine that could, it would really hurt them on a P.R. level to be seen as another evil empire (microsoft and sadly to say my favorite of the giants &quot;apple). Submitting their loyalist to another bout of dissapointment in the evolution of networking solutions is going to definitely hurt them.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why in the world would they partner with a monopolizing company if they are trying to evolve the wireless information market. At&amp;t, verizon, nextel, t-mobile will pigeon hole their new/current subscribers into another round of contract signings. Has no one learned from the innovative thinking of Virgin mobile? Slowly but surely I am seeing parents gradually send their money in the direction of Mr. Branson&#8217;s company. The idea that we are still limited in connectivity and despite the fact that we own the intellectual property (as in the actual phone you purchased) and still cannot do as we choose with devices shows the lack of market freedom in the u.s wireless market. Expansion for the consumer is the next turn that these up and coming companies should look into. Google has been a brand founded and loved for it&#8217;s freedom and anti stance of structured empires. Cross platform has been the mantra of this little engine that could, it would really hurt them on a P.R. level to be seen as another evil empire (microsoft and sadly to say my favorite of the giants &#8220;apple). Submitting their loyalist to another bout of dissapointment in the evolution of networking solutions is going to definitely hurt them.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/12 queries in 0.011 seconds using disk

Served from: www.slipperybrick.com @ 2012-02-14 05:55:32 -->
