<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: A Railgun Cannon.  What&#8217;s Next Star Destroyers?</title> <atom:link href="http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/</link> <description>Dropping Gadgets, Breaking News</description> <lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2011 17:05:14 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.5</generator> <item><title>By: Dan</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-293480</link> <dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2011 20:35:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-293480</guid> <description>First-off, there are no railguns in Halo. The weapons used by UNSC starships and orbital defense platforms are Magnetic Accelerator Cannons, which is a badass-sounding name for &quot;really massive coilgun that will ruin your day&quot;.A railgun works by sending the electrical current THROUGH the projectile itself (thus causing the immense heat release, and partial vaporization of both the projectile and the rails into plasma.A coilgun uses a series of electromagnetic coils that wrap around the barrel of the weapon, and a ferromagnetic kinetic impactor. The coils generate tremendous EM fields that pull the impactor along the barrel; as it reaches the first coil, that coil shuts down, and the next one is powered up; and so on for the entire length of the weapon. Repeat the action with powerful enough EM fields and a fast enough coil firing sequence, and you can easily accelerate the round to impressive speeds.In both cases, the advantage is that there is no chemical combustion/detonation that propels the round; this means no hot gases, no combustion residue, no spent casings, and increased efficiency.The only problems we have is an atmosphere, which creates significant drag on the impactor. Otherwise, railguns/coilguns are IMO chillingly powerful and effective weapons. The expected performance of a warship-level railgun is to deliver 302760000 Joules of energy on impact.That means you being hit by two EMD GP50 125-ton locomotives plus a few railcars.
At 100 miles per hour.
Falling from space.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>First-off, there are no railguns in Halo. The weapons used by UNSC starships and orbital defense platforms are Magnetic Accelerator Cannons, which is a badass-sounding name for &#8220;really massive coilgun that will ruin your day&#8221;.</p><p>A railgun works by sending the electrical current THROUGH the projectile itself (thus causing the immense heat release, and partial vaporization of both the projectile and the rails into plasma.</p><p>A coilgun uses a series of electromagnetic coils that wrap around the barrel of the weapon, and a ferromagnetic kinetic impactor. The coils generate tremendous EM fields that pull the impactor along the barrel; as it reaches the first coil, that coil shuts down, and the next one is powered up; and so on for the entire length of the weapon. Repeat the action with powerful enough EM fields and a fast enough coil firing sequence, and you can easily accelerate the round to impressive speeds.</p><p>In both cases, the advantage is that there is no chemical combustion/detonation that propels the round; this means no hot gases, no combustion residue, no spent casings, and increased efficiency.</p><p>The only problems we have is an atmosphere, which creates significant drag on the impactor. Otherwise, railguns/coilguns are IMO chillingly powerful and effective weapons. The expected performance of a warship-level railgun is to deliver 302760000 Joules of energy on impact.</p><p>That means you being hit by two EMD GP50 125-ton locomotives plus a few railcars.<br
/> At 100 miles per hour.<br
/> Falling from space.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-276086</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 15:47:12 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-276086</guid> <description>umm..  dont know that much about pysics, but becuse the bullet is being pulled by magnetic coils, and as it reaches each coil that coil turns of, there wouldent realy be that much recoil would there?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>umm..  dont know that much about pysics, but becuse the bullet is being pulled by magnetic coils, and as it reaches each coil that coil turns of, there wouldent realy be that much recoil would there?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-261795</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:28:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-261795</guid> <description>the idea of a railgun is way older than starwars. Documents we(the U.S.) captured from the Nazis after world war 2 theoriezed on the possiblity of a magnetic anti-aircraft gun. However, engineers discovered that each battery would need the amount of power used by Chicago, and the idea was abandoned.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the idea of a railgun is way older than starwars. Documents we(the U.S.) captured from the Nazis after world war 2 theoriezed on the possiblity of a magnetic anti-aircraft gun. However, engineers discovered that each battery would need the amount of power used by Chicago, and the idea was abandoned.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: random dude</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-258974</link> <dc:creator>random dude</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 15:05:20 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-258974</guid> <description>if it is true that the projectile flies into orbit then it should be able to fire at intercontinental ballistic missiles such as that which north korea seems so intent on makeing</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if it is true that the projectile flies into orbit then it should be able to fire at intercontinental ballistic missiles such as that which north korea seems so intent on makeing</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Doopy</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-258954</link> <dc:creator>Doopy</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 04:21:29 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-258954</guid> <description>Just to be clear... Halo doesn&#039;t feature any railguns. They use MAC (Magnetic Acceleration Cannon) guns, which are an upscaled Gauss cannon. Similar in concept to a railgun but mechanically different.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just to be clear&#8230; Halo doesn&#8217;t feature any railguns. They use MAC (Magnetic Acceleration Cannon) guns, which are an upscaled Gauss cannon. Similar in concept to a railgun but mechanically different.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: asdf</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-258914</link> <dc:creator>asdf</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 03:27:03 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-258914</guid> <description>I&#039;m sorry but I came across this article and no one (maybe a few) knows what they&#039;re talking about. First of all railguns are not new. They&#039;ve been around for a while. Someone was correct earlier about the rods being vaporized. Only some of it is vaporized when it is shot due to the magnetic force converting some of the slug into plasma; the rest burns up due to friction because we&#039;re talking really freaking fast.And secondly magnetism does not violate Newtons laws. Mysterious magnetism pushes rod, mysterious magnetism pushes gun. Anyone ever held two magnets near each other? They&#039;re both repelling. If you put a magnet on the ground and a magnet above it, the magnet above pushes the one on the ground down and vice versa.Saying that the impulse is in a circular motion makes absolutely no sense. The laws of the conservation of momentum state that the sum of all changes in momentum are zero. Guess what the sum of impulses in a circle are: zero! Guess what the impulse on the rod if: REALLY BIG! That means the total change in momentum would be non-zero and would violate a fundamental law. Fail.Just because you took a physics class and know the name of Gauss and Maxwell doesn&#039;t mean you know what you&#039;re talking about.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but I came across this article and no one (maybe a few) knows what they&#8217;re talking about. First of all railguns are not new. They&#8217;ve been around for a while. Someone was correct earlier about the rods being vaporized. Only some of it is vaporized when it is shot due to the magnetic force converting some of the slug into plasma; the rest burns up due to friction because we&#8217;re talking really freaking fast.</p><p>And secondly magnetism does not violate Newtons laws. Mysterious magnetism pushes rod, mysterious magnetism pushes gun. Anyone ever held two magnets near each other? They&#8217;re both repelling. If you put a magnet on the ground and a magnet above it, the magnet above pushes the one on the ground down and vice versa.</p><p>Saying that the impulse is in a circular motion makes absolutely no sense. The laws of the conservation of momentum state that the sum of all changes in momentum are zero. Guess what the sum of impulses in a circle are: zero! Guess what the impulse on the rod if: REALLY BIG! That means the total change in momentum would be non-zero and would violate a fundamental law. Fail.</p><p>Just because you took a physics class and know the name of Gauss and Maxwell doesn&#8217;t mean you know what you&#8217;re talking about.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-252646</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 07:35:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-252646</guid> <description>I believe, that the technology is ready. Origionally back in the starwars project, the materials they had were inferior to what was available now, the developments in electronics and materials has led in advancements to make this weapon, viable for combat. While they initialy set the project aside.. that&#039;s exactly what they did, set it aside. To get back to it later. Meantime, many people have made small model EM systems that worked just fine. *EM bullettrains anyone?* I had a friend who had a small two rail system built out of spare parts in his barn. I read a story of a college student building one with his teachers assistance for a school project.Military simply has the funding to get the proper materials, put them together in precision, and have vessels large enough to power them. The technology all exists. It&#039;s just scary when they are all brought together, and you can really Reach out and touch someone. Almost quite literally without noise, and with them not being able to detect it.Not to say that a good enough system couldn&#039;t detect it.. however. Unlike a tomahawk, You can&#039;t spoof the shell, you cannot shoot it down, and you certainly can&#039;t do much to protect yourself from it.This same technology I hope, will be used to send space shuttles into orbit someday.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I believe, that the technology is ready. Origionally back in the starwars project, the materials they had were inferior to what was available now, the developments in electronics and materials has led in advancements to make this weapon, viable for combat. While they initialy set the project aside.. that&#8217;s exactly what they did, set it aside. To get back to it later. Meantime, many people have made small model EM systems that worked just fine. *EM bullettrains anyone?* I had a friend who had a small two rail system built out of spare parts in his barn. I read a story of a college student building one with his teachers assistance for a school project.</p><p>Military simply has the funding to get the proper materials, put them together in precision, and have vessels large enough to power them. The technology all exists. It&#8217;s just scary when they are all brought together, and you can really Reach out and touch someone. Almost quite literally without noise, and with them not being able to detect it.</p><p>Not to say that a good enough system couldn&#8217;t detect it.. however. Unlike a tomahawk, You can&#8217;t spoof the shell, you cannot shoot it down, and you certainly can&#8217;t do much to protect yourself from it.</p><p>This same technology I hope, will be used to send space shuttles into orbit someday.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Anonymous</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-227740</link> <dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 03:47:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-227740</guid> <description>Naval Warfare Center????...not unless the center is on the City of Atlatis.  The photo is from the TV show Stargate Atlatis in the Sci Fi Channel.  Nice Try</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Naval Warfare Center????&#8230;not unless the center is on the City of Atlatis.  The photo is from the TV show Stargate Atlatis in the Sci Fi Channel.  Nice Try</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: nik</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-205871</link> <dc:creator>nik</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 04:13:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-205871</guid> <description>how stupid are you people that picture is from star gate atlantis</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how stupid are you people that picture is from star gate atlantis</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: clark</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-163764</link> <dc:creator>clark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 04 Oct 2008 06:25:16 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-163764</guid> <description>the whole idea of an emp being a problem is childish and scifi at best.  Even if a large enough one could be produced, due to the extreme magnetic fields created by the rail gun itself farraday cages would no doubt be integral to its design, shielding it from electromagnetic pulses.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the whole idea of an emp being a problem is childish and scifi at best.  Even if a large enough one could be produced, due to the extreme magnetic fields created by the rail gun itself farraday cages would no doubt be integral to its design, shielding it from electromagnetic pulses.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: michael</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-138848</link> <dc:creator>michael</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 04:35:35 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-138848</guid> <description>the article mentioned converting more ships to electronic battlecruisers. is that smart? it may be fancy but wouldn&#039;t that increase the effectiveness of electronic warfare? we could get to a point where some nerd on a decent computer posed more of a threat than a battle ready fleet or an entire battalion of soldiers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the article mentioned converting more ships to electronic battlecruisers. is that smart? it may be fancy but wouldn&#8217;t that increase the effectiveness of electronic warfare? we could get to a point where some nerd on a decent computer posed more of a threat than a battle ready fleet or an entire battalion of soldiers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: silver</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-136531</link> <dc:creator>silver</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2008 21:41:13 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-136531</guid> <description>look i may not be as smart as many of you folks but rail gun technology seems to be a bit unlikely to work by 2020-2025. while yes it may work in firing a slug but in order for the weapon to be used effectively wouldn&#039;t it require to shoot out multiply rounds per minute rather then having it use as an artillery cannon. because here its saying the rail will act as a cheaper tomahawks. and aiming the weapon will require a advance targeting system to fire it. perhaps a supercomputer is require to process the targeting data.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>look i may not be as smart as many of you folks but rail gun technology seems to be a bit unlikely to work by 2020-2025. while yes it may work in firing a slug but in order for the weapon to be used effectively wouldn&#8217;t it require to shoot out multiply rounds per minute rather then having it use as an artillery cannon. because here its saying the rail will act as a cheaper tomahawks. and aiming the weapon will require a advance targeting system to fire it. perhaps a supercomputer is require to process the targeting data.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Tom</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-122573</link> <dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 13:57:17 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-122573</guid> <description>InSoMniaK604: The armed forces hardened their equipment against EMPs back during the Cold War, just for that reason. Seeing as the Soviets had nuclear arsenals to rival ours, we wanted to be prepared for that. Now, civilian equipment would likely be destroyed, yes.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>InSoMniaK604: The armed forces hardened their equipment against EMPs back during the Cold War, just for that reason. Seeing as the Soviets had nuclear arsenals to rival ours, we wanted to be prepared for that. Now, civilian equipment would likely be destroyed, yes.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: InSoMnIaK604</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-122534</link> <dc:creator>InSoMnIaK604</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 08:21:18 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-122534</guid> <description>Wouldn&#039;t an EMP of some kind just rape the US Navy?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wouldn&#8217;t an EMP of some kind just rape the US Navy?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Bunneh</title><link>http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/comment-page-1/#comment-122457</link> <dc:creator>Bunneh</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 11 Jun 2008 23:53:04 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://www.slipperybrick.com/2007/01/navy-unveils-railgun-cannon/#comment-122457</guid> <description>Not to nitpick again, but the idea of making a real rail gun is hardly &quot;new&quot; at all.
Anyone ever hear of &quot;Star Wars&quot; (not the movie, the actual army initiative).
Read up on it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative
The technology has been around for over 20 years.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to nitpick again, but the idea of making a real rail gun is hardly &#8220;new&#8221; at all.<br
/> Anyone ever hear of &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; (not the movie, the actual army initiative).<br
/> Read up on it here: <a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_Defense_Initiative</a><br
/> The technology has been around for over 20 years.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk
Page Caching using disk (enhanced) (user agent is rejected)
Database Caching 2/22 queries in 0.018 seconds using disk

Served from: www.slipperybrick.com @ 2012-02-14 05:49:19 -->
